Patrick Alan

I think we're alone now.

Entries Comments



Giraffe Riding, Glittery Gnomes

1 September, 2010 (17:49) | Main | By: Patrick

I love analogies.

They’re like little elves that tell a story that has nothing to do with what you’re talking about, but means the same thing, but in a different way, except with gnomes and a giraffe and a little bit of glitter.

I have a problem getting to the grocery store. I like the grocery store, but I have other things to do, so I don’t always go.

Here’s the thing about going to the grocery store. Sometimes I know exactly what I need. I’m making a special dinner or it’s football season and I need chili. My special chili, you want some, I know.

Sometimes I write a list. In my world, we call this a grocery list. It helps us remember what to buy. *winks at plotters*

Sometimes I just go in and try to figure out what to buy when I get there. When I do this, I either buy too much or just the basics, milk, eggs, a case of water, and Cinnamon Toast Crunch cereal.

Sometimes I know that I need three dinners, lunch for the week and breakfast. I might know that one of the dinners will be a chicken, one will be a kielbasa and pepper, and one will be an inspiration. Meaning, I have no idea. I’ll probably get two frozen meals that I could use for dinner three and maybe I’ll see something amazing that I never thought of.

Maybe you spend more time in the grocery store than me. Maybe you go down each row more than once. Maybe you have a detailed list and never buy more than you need. Maybe you’re a stocker and always have plenty of food at the house. Maybe you keep a detailed list of the things you need, updating each time you open the fridge or pantry. We all have our own process for buying groceries.

What I am saying is, I never go to the grocery store and buy 16 gallons of milk, only to have it all go bad in my refrigerator. I might occasionally buy 6 bags of dried beans because I think I’ll become a vegetarian. I might buy lettuce that I never use or won’t use all of it, but if I buy 16 gallons of milk, it’s because I have a kiddie pool and plenty of pudding mix. Bring your bikinis.

What was I talking about again? Where did that analogy elf go? I don’t know, but I’m going to write three dinners into my novel right now. Not sure what the third one is yet, but I’ll probably find something exciting at the grocery store.

I Like Me

30 August, 2010 (18:24) | Main | By: Patrick

Well, I am not avoiding the internet this week. Sorry about that. I’m still behind my fence though. It’s not like I made it through last week completely offline anyway.

I had a bunch of different ideas for a week of blogging this week, but the first two attempts didn’t work and I am suddenly distracted.

I’m now on Facebook. I Like me. You should Like me, too! I’m right here. Or you can click that linky thing over on the right. At least, I think you can do that.

I’ve played around with Facebook before, but don’t really see much point in a Fan Page. I mean, that would be almost like having a Blog. I don’t see much point in an unpublished writer having a blog.

I kind of have to do Facebook. I agreed to give a presentation on how to create a website/blog and use Twitter and was asked to include Facebook, so I am now studying all the customizations available to Facebook. Surprisingly, it’s not much…

I know. Fascinating, isn’t it. Well, at the same time, I challenged myself to writing twice as much on my novel. At least I can’t say this is distracting me from writing. Well, I can, but it will cost me $25 if it does. That’s not going to happen.

Maybe ‘ll develop an App for Facebook. I’ll call it “Patrick Alan Town” or “Patrick Alan Wars”.

Children Behave

23 August, 2010 (07:28) | Main | By: Patrick

That’s what they say when we’re together.

So, I’m gone. I’m currently on a top secret mission to Germany. Or Russia. Or Persia. I can’t tell you the truth as it would compromise my and your safety. Or I’m in New Jersey and working really hard. And by that I mean, this week’s experiment is no blogging, commenting on blogs, and no twitter. I’d say no reading Patriots news, but who am I kidding.

Last week, I tried the week of writing advice. Who knows what we’ll try next week. It’s not like I am a real blogger.

In the mean time, I think this would be an excellent week for you to blog about me. Go ahead. Say what it is that you want to say to me. You have my permission. Not that you need it.

I’ll be over here, running just as fast as I can.

Sense and Setting

20 August, 2010 (07:30) | Main | By: Patrick

I sensed a disturbance in the setting. Like thousands of vanilla scented candles were suddenly snuffled out by a soft gentle breeze in a sudden whoofing sound and flash of light that left a chill in the air and the odor of burnt vanilla. The street lights of the parking lot dimmed.

The kangaroos had arrived and they meant business. “Yadho, Paduki. Yadho.”

I don’t know how they found me. I set down my mocha latte on the hood of the still warm car. My lightsaber jumped to my hand, hissing its angry buzz, as the green glow lit the ground around me.

The kangaroo with the eye patch raised his blaster. I wondered if he could sense his imminent death.

Sense and Setting Ability. My favorite Jane Austen song. Jane says. I’m done with Sergio. It’s like I have an addiction to Jane.

I like simple advice.

There are fantastic authors who talk about all six senses, or seven, or fourteen. They are fantastic. You should learn from them.

I like simple.

This was the most sensible, non-nonsensical, set of setting related sense advice I ever heard.

  • Use all five senses every five hundred words

There. Done. Just try it. Every time you write. Or don’t, but think about it. Some tricks to use -

- smelling food counts as taste.

ok, it was just one trick.

Honestly, taste is the hardest to work in.

John followed Jane into the livingroom. He could smell the receding odor from the Furry Mocha Dragon. He licked the couch. It’s smooth pleather tasted cold and plasticky with a hint on salt. He hoped it wasn’t from dog urine. He knew there was no saving the bunnies.

Don’t give characters a licking fetish just to use taste more often. Or do, if you write that kind of book. I don’t write that kind of book. At least, as far as you know. Unless you know otherwise. Hush… Shhh.
Shhh…

The senses ground the reader to the setting. Even if you tell them nothing else, using the senses to experience the setting, the reader will feel like they are there, even if they don’t know where there is.

When I was younger, I had a book called How To Draw Comics The Marvel Way. I practiced drawing boobies. The Marvel Way. They were huge and magnificently round. And sometimes, I drew hips. But never feet. Mostly boobies.

In the book was a favorite piece of advice.

  • Exaggerate the action

It showed a picture of a character punching. It was fairly realistic.

It looked like this. See how I am standing with my fist out?

Next to it, there was a Marvel Character Punch. The character was beyond any physically possible stance and clearly had punched way hard. Like, totally way hard.

He looked like this. See how I am punching? *Kapow*

Get it?

What I am saying in every sense of the setting, is that you can’t overdo it. Well, you can, but no, you can’t. Unless that’s what you do, because if you do, stop that.

What you may think is too much is probably just enough. If you often get feedback on your writing that there’s no setting – *KAPOW* – get it?

There are two types of setting, explicit and implied. The difference is -

With explicit setting, you explicitly tell the reader where you are.

The library was silent. Jane strode through the rows of bookshelves. She could see everyone was naked. She knew she was too late. The Librarian Clothing Thief had struck again. Jane was angry with herself. Her mouth was dry. She needed a mocha latte grande.

Where was Jane? Trick question. She was in New Mexico.

With implied setting, you imply something that gives the reader a clue as to where they are.

The toast popped out of the toaster with a ding and a slightly burnt odor. Jane snatched the warm bread, slathered butter that wasn’t butter, if you can believe that, on it and jammed the whole thing into her mouth.

The reader can tell Jane was in the bathroom. Because that’s where toasters belong.

Neither is better or worse, right or wrong, unless you are doing it wrong. Then it is wrong, so don’t do that.

Just remember, each scene needs to start with a setting, either explicit or implied. If you are in fast moving action scenes, sometimes the implied is better. Except when it’s not. I expect that’s clear by now.

If you start a new scene in the same setting or location, implied setting is the quick and subtle way to remind the reader that you are in the same location.

———————————
And there you go. It’s over. My week of attempting to give writing advice has come to an end. It is time to clap. Not for a job well done, for most of it was stupid, wrong and nonsensical, but the experiment has ended.

If you have any questions, raise your hand. Remember, there are no stupid questions, just stupid people. And no stupid people read this blog, so, you and your question are very smart. Unless you’re not, but as long as you use the disclaimer, “I’m hot”, everything will be OK.

Plotting and Scope

19 August, 2010 (07:32) | Main | By: Patrick

I sense a sinister plot. Mwa ha ha! I continue the week of pointless writing advice that isn’t well thought out or explained! You can’t stop me. Not reading this only makes me stronger. That’s what they tell me.

You know how to plot. You own a periscope. This means you can stop reading. Should you? No. Ok, maybe. Will you? Uh..

I’m not here to break ground on plotting. There are tons of fantastic articulate writers with profound thoughts on plotting. Save The Cat. Walk the Dog. The Three Act Structure. The Four Act Play. 10 Minute Abs.

If you are unfamiliar with those, it doesn’t matter. You probably have some level of plotting intuitively in your head from years of reading and watching movies and such.

My favorite is the seven point plot structure. I will share it with you now.

1. A CHARACTER
2. In a SETTING
3. Has a PROBLEM
4. Attempts to SOLVE
5. SUCCEEDS or FAILS
6. Leading to the CLIMAX
7. Resulting in VALIDATION

It’s a simplified view. I think this one has a few holes in it. This seven point plan has been written in a variety of ways. Do not use this to plan/plot your novel. It’s more of a hidden map. Be aware of the structure underneath.

The thing that I like about this plot structure is the PROBLEM/ ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE and SUCCEEDS OR FAILS. The thing that I left out is, paprika, no. Something else. Oh yeah. THINGS GET WORSE. And that is the repetitive cycle of the story. There must always be a problem. The character must always attempt to solve it. The CLIMAX is the problem the character could not solve if they did not change.

A common failure in plotting is this very cycle. Often seen is the character walks in and bad things happen. Then they drive to the next place and bad things happen. Suddenly, they are on a plane and wild bunnies are licking their faces.

See, the character is not engaged, but the bunnies are cute. Ok, that’s a bad example. I love cute bunny stories.

Ok, it’s sort of like this.

Jane is awake. She needs her coffee. She goes to the kitchen and brews a pot. When it finishes, she discovers she’s out of milk! Duh duh daaaaaa! Oh NO! She runs to her car and discovers she’s low on gas! Oh NO! She will have to stop at the gas station and Starbucks on the way to work!

Now you see the other side of the problem.

SCOPE!

Scope is the impact/size of the problem. How big are the problems? How big are the consequences when the character succeeds or fails?

Jane walks across the kitchen with her coffee headed to the fridge for milk. Meow, yells the cat. Startled, Jane throws her milkless coffee into the Wizard Circle she drew on the livingroom carpet and accidentally shouts “meeger mager miger”, which as you know, combined with coffee and a Wizard Circle summons a Furry Mocha Dragon of Doom.

Jane ducks left, then right, and dives out the back door where Garbo the Fuzzy Mocha Dragon can’t see her. Safe. Ding dong. Someone’s at the front door. It’s her neighbor, Bob. He’s holding a box full of cute little bunnies. Garbo sniffs at the air. Garbo loves crunchy bunnies.

The key thing is scope. What is at stake. Also, the things that happen must be directly related to the actions of the character. It may not even be an immediate reaction. It could be caused by a long forgotten action of the character. Part of the problem is figuring out why these things are happening, because all things happen for a reason.

It could even be a pre-emptive reaction. Garbo could have been sent by Evil Wizard Rodan the Evil Wizard, so evil and wizardly he’s named that way twice, because Jane is destined to defeat him and full contact checkers and rule Mars even though she really only wants coffee with milk. And four packets of Splenda. Is that too much to ask for in life?

In summary, don’t spill your coffee. Make sure you have milk. Dragons eat bunnies. The plot plan is not a map, more like guideposts. Make it bigger. Make sure there is a reason related to the character and the consequences are significant.

Questions?
How do you take your coffee? Kristen will be making a Starbucks run and I want you to get your orders in now.

#1k1hr and the Revelation

18 August, 2010 (08:40) | Main | By: Patrick

You know, it’s been a while and #1k1hr seems to have grown in popularity.

Roxanne St. Claire posted a great question about the purpose of 1k1hr yesterday over on MurderSheWrites.com. Make sure to stop by and check it out.

Sometimes I watch on twitter and I see a comment and think, hey, they are doing it wrong. But who am I to judge? Well, I am me. But I am not very judgmental. If I was judgmental, I would judge.

I know how I do #1k1hr and why. It’s my cone of silence. It’s my fortress of solitude. I can hear you tweet when I am in here, but you can’t stop me. It’s my shield against distraction.

Can I write without it? Yep.

The thing about #1k1hr is it keeps me from waiting for an epiphany to write. Because of other life commitments, I don’t get immersed in my writing as often as I would like. I don’t have a dog that I take for long walks each morning as I sort out the next scene. I use #1k1hr to force it. Force me to take a stab at writing the story. Note: do not get me a dog. George is close enough to being a dog.

Some of this goes into my process. First thing to know about me. I don’t take notes. On anything. Email is the closest thing I have to notes. I keep everything in my brain.

When I start a story, I know the beginning, at least the opening scene – the moment of change. The reason why I am starting the story there. I know the black moment. The climax and the ending. I have an idea for several way points along the way. I also have a theme. I love theme.

These things are in my mind. At all times. I probably have five to seven novels in my head where I know these key points all the time. I usually know the top three to five characters personalities. Or what I think their personalities are. I have some novels in my head where I haven’t solved all these things that I need to have, too.

And then we have the scenes in-between. I could wait forever for those scenes. I have to force those out and see if they work. I have get the characters to the next conflict that is key to my theme. I might take several shots at those. Sometimes they just come to me. With #1k1hr, I can force them. It makes me make decisions about what happens next. Sometimes this puts me in a hole. Sometimes it’s a wonderful revelation about a character or conflict.

That in a nutshell is my process. Add to the mix a pair of fantastic first readers and what I suspect is an army of second readers, and now I have a process to complete a novel that I have a lot of confidence in.

For me, the revelation came from letting a first reader read what I was writing before it was done. I was very uncomfortable with the first half of the book. I needed someone to see what I saw was wrong. Then I needed to talk it out.

I was brought into the writer critique world with the recommendation to never have someone critique a partial. I understand the mentality behind that recommendation. For someone less awesome than I, it can teach them to question their own judgment.

For me, I needed validation of the parts that suck. The parts that weren’t working for other people. Things I suspected were wrong. I needed to bounce the ideas of the story off someone.

Letting someone read totally freed me. Like totally. It was gnarly, I tell you.

On to the questions:
Where was I when you had your writing process epiphany?
What’s for lunch?
How many toes does an elephant have?
Today’s word – epiphany. Make sure to use it at least twice. Look the cat just had an epiphany. And by that I mean, he farted.

Talent

17 August, 2010 (08:58) | Main | By: Patrick

Continuing my posts on writing thoughts, I decided it is time to tackle Talent.

Talent. Do you have it? Where can I buy it? I would like to get it with free super shipping savings please.

First, a definition from Dictionary.com. I read it online, it must be true!

Talent: a special natural ability or aptitude

What is talent? Don’t hurt me. Baby, don’t hurt me, no more. What is talent?

I mean… Talent, it’s the ability to do something. Anything. I am talented at wearing flip flops.

Most often, “Talent” is related to a person’s speed of learning. This is incorrect, but we do think that way. Stop it. We think someone is naturally “talented” at something they pick up quickly. Let’s look at the following equations. 1 / 1 = 1. 8 / 4 = 2. 2 > 1. Make sense?

Come over here and look at this whiteboard drawing. Look, I am circling this box for emphasis. Two is greater than one!

If someone can learn something in one hour that another can learn in four hours, if they only study/practice for one hour, compared to the slower learner who practices eight hours, are they more talented?

I just asked a math question. See, the slower learner studied more than the faster learner and learned more. It took much longer, but they worked harder and therefore are better looking. And by that I mean, more talented.

Really, talent is just a practiced skill. Some skills come easier to some people than others. But as far as writing a novel, there are so many skills, that very few are just flat out, across the board “naturally talented”. Everyone, except me, has to work on something. Even my hair is perfect. Sorry. Your jealousy may continue.

So, when it comes to writing, knowing your talent and knowing your weaknesses help you become a better writer. Are you talented at dialogue? grammar? plotting? conflict? randomly inserted words? setting?

What are your weaknesses? Opening scenes? adverbs? Hot women in bikinis, selling donuts? characters?

How are you practicing to improve your weaknesses?

Hopefully you get that the point is, if you want to be talented, go to Best Buy and get a new giant flat screen LED tv. Or, you know, practice. I know which one I am going to choose. Bring on the donuts! Wait. What?

This was a deep, meaningful, well-thought out post on Talent. I’m putting on my flip flops now. Why are you calling them thongs? Flip flops!

Now some random discussion points:
Who would win in a fight – Jesse Dart from Force Five or Derek Wildstar from Star Blazers?
What is your favorite talent of mine?
You can just comment on how lovely my hair is, if you would like.